All Posts

The activation of enabling capability outcome(s) introduces them to live conditions. What follows is a period of operational adaptation during which the dial moves along the value realisation trajectory as: Users adjust behaviours Management routines mature Integration friction is reduced Measurement stabilises Early measurements reflect movement of the dial, though not necessarily yet to an optimised or settled state. A credible baseline emerges only once: A predicted settli

Articles 1 and 2 examined how value potential is constructed across the value chain through iterative design, architectural configuration, and integration. Activation concerns what happens when enabling capability is deployed into live service and latent value is exposed to the real operational environment. Activation does not create value. It tests whether the value latent in design and integration translates into measurable performance in practice. The dial tracks managed b

Article 1 of the theme, Moving the Value Chain in Transformation Delivery, explained how value forms across a series of structural conversions. This article examines how those conversions are deliberately shaped before investment commitment is formalised. The value chain does not emerge automatically from approval. It is constructed. Design strength, coherence, and ability to move the dial depend heavily on choices made before enabling product delivery begins. Designing the v

This is the first article in the second organisational transformation theme, Moving the Dial in Transformation Delivery. Strategy defines organisational priorities and directional intent (ambition). Portfolio management evaluates the opportunities, qualifies the most achievable, and determines the relative delivery priority and sequencing of transformation programmes.     The dial represents the formation, strength and sustainability of benefits (managed value realisation) o

B y the time transformation reaches its post-design delivery stage, the conditions for delivery may not be ideal. Intent has been declared, enabling architecture defined, outputs and integration designed, approvals given, and activity is now underway, yet some uncertainty remains. Commitment remains partial. Capacity is stretched. Attention shifts. Context evolves. This is the normal circumstance in which transformation operates. Theme 1 has been concerned with this reality:

Assurance is widely regarded as a cornerstone of effective transformation governance. It is assumed to provide confidence, reduce risk, and strengthen control. Under certain conditions, however, assurance can counterintuitively weaken executive control. This is a failure of design. The role assurance is meant to play At its core, assurance exists to support executive decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. It doesn’t exist to eliminate risk, nor to replace judgement.

The Sponsor is the senior leader accountable for ensuring that enabling outcomes and intended operational outcomes (benefits) are realised. The role sits at the intersection of strategy, governance, and delivery, providing direction, legitimacy, and decision-making authority. Sponsors work closely with programme delivery and change leadership to sustain momentum as delivery progresses. That positioning makes sponsorship one of the most exposed roles in transformation. Account

Commitment in transformation is rarely absolute. Even when the stakes are existential, it is typically partial, contested, and ephemeral. Some will judge an initiative to be the best use of scarce resources; others will argue for alternatives. Some will see it as the highest priority; others will view it as one of many competing demands. Some will wait, watch, and reserve judgement. Influence is uneven, attention shifts, and context changes. None of this is abnormal. It is ho

Local government operates in environments where statutory duties, inspection regimes, political commitments, legacy programmes, and emerging crises all carry legitimate claims on attention and resources. In practice, this can make prioritisation difficult to sustain if competing commitments accumulate faster than they can safely be absorbed. If this dynamic is not actively managed, portfolios are likely to carry more priority initiatives than available capacity can safely man

Transformation rarely begins in ideal conditions. Delivery environments are politically charged, resource-constrained, and continually in flux. In practice, the question is seldom whether conditions are perfect, but whether they are sufficient . Change approval authorises intent. Change readiness is a key factor in determining the extent to which success will match intent. Conflating approval with readiness is one of the more persistent sources of fragility in transformatio

This is the first in a series of interpretive essays exploring the conditions that enable successful organisational transformation in practice, and how delivery outcomes are affected when they are absent or unstained. This essay opens a wider set of essays grouped around five transformation themes: Theme 1:  What enables successful transformation Theme 2:  Moving the dial in transformation delivery Theme 3 : Designing an integrated delivery system Theme 4:  Transformation del